| Freedom of Elections and Election Monitoring |
|
|
| Written by Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, PhD | |||
| Saturday, 10 July 2010 07:30 | |||
|
FREEDOM OF ELECTIONS AND ELECTION MONITORING
Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, PhD Rationale for Election Monitoring Democracy is seen as uniquely suited to provide a peaceful means of competition for power and influence. However, opting to go the electoral route is not without risks. An important advantage can go to those who win foundational elections. The stakes may seem extremely high in future elections as well, providing strong incentive to opt for extra-legal means to ensure victory. It is in these delicate situations that election monitors can play an important role to ensure the freedom of elections. Election monitoring is important because elections are the cornerstone of creating a democratic political system. As such, monitoring can assist democratic consolidation by instilling domestic and international legitimacy. Peaceful elections may also promote reconciliation between former adversaries. Post-conflict society like Nepal, however, is often poorly equipped to conduct elections in a conducive atmosphere due to residue of violence and other factors. Despite a formal end to the fighting, instability often persists and there are several instances where the might of gun power is still pervasive. A continued lack of security makes campaigning difficult, to say nothing of actually conducting a vote. Institutions needed to conduct elections are often nonexistent, or damaged by the conflict. Where contentious elections present fears of vote tampering and other irregularities, the presence of election monitors may serve to prevent shenanigans and give parties greater confidence that the vote was free and fair. The key to achieving this outcome is monitors who are seen by all sides as neutral, professional and impartial. Monitoring can enhance the credibility and legitimacy of elections, thereby helping to reduce electoral violence. It can help maintain a working peace agreement because losers lack the ability to shout "fraud!" and disrupt a country's democratization. One way in which monitors do this is by taking independent vote tallies, which prevents governments from manipulating the vote. Even before this, some international monitors are expected to arrive long before the vote to observe campaigning and voter registration efforts. As such, in the long-term, monitoring can assist in building and strengthening domestic electoral institutions. Election Monitoring in Nepal The idea of systematically observing elections by national and international observers is relatively a new phenomenon. The first election with international monitoring mission was in 1991 when more than 72 international and 1500 local monitors observed the elections coordinated by NEOC. Prior to that, A Citizens' Elections Observation Committee was formed to monitor the Panchayat election soon after the national referendum. In 1994, during the mid-term polls, NEOC hosted more than 130 international and more than 2000 national observers who actively participated in the monitoring process across the country. Similarly, in 1999, NEOC coordinated more than 50 international and almost 3000 national observers to monitor the elections held on two different phases. Similarly, NEOC was reformed in 2002 when the date for the General Elections was announced. However, the elections could not take place in the scheduled time due to extremely difficult political circumstances followed by the undue royal intervention. NEOC was incepted to ensure the principals and norms as enshrined in the universal suffrage as guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights-1948 and the ICCPR. NEOC coordinates the election monitoring process in close coordination with Election Commission and other related governmental and non-governmental institutions. The activities of NEOC are more than merely observing the actual polls but rather conduct nationwide voter’s education campaign to ensure free, fair, unrigged and peaceful elections. Its activities also include encouraging political parties to field clean candidates and adopt proper electoral practices. It also set out to persuade the Election Commission to introduce a more ethical electoral system, and to urge voters to use their vote more carefully. NEOC is essentially a rigorous and independent effort of civil society organizations to ensure that elections are as clean and fair as possible. During the run up to the upcoming elections for the Constituent Assembly, NEOC will prepare its own Charter in the form of a “Public Pledge” to present to the political parties, candidates, Election Commission and civil society, mainly through the print and electronic media and local symposiums. Meetings with civil society and political party representatives will be organized to disseminate the message relating to the freedom of elections in different parts of the country. NEOC will closely observe and advocate ensuring the freedom of elections by seeking fairness or transparency in electoral activity and raising popular awareness about the problem of corruption: in other words combating the highhandedness of the powerful through the use of money, muscle and manipulation. Monitoring the elections for the upcoming Constituent Assembly is a giant endeavor--a synergy of challenge and opportunity. NEOC too, does not have any experience of monitoring such form of elections. Obviously, the nature of elections for the constituent assembly is quite different than the conventional system of parliamentary elections. It requires vigorous exercise to understand the complexities associated with the electoral process including the voting techniques as per the provisions in the new laws and directives to be issued by the Election Commission. NEOC will closely look into all dynamics related to the electoral process, Categorically, it will monitor within its jurisdiction various problems related to the administration of the elections, selection of candidates, political financing, the behavior of political parties and ways to ensure that voters are sufficiently well informed in the entire electoral process. Volunteers and well-known personalities from civil society will be asked to participate in a campaign to raise massive awareness through training Charter and other IEC (information, education and communication) materials. Constraints to Freedom of Elections Most of the past regimes in Nepal thus far have not been able to fully put in place some of the basic foundations for free and fair elections. There are instances where voter registration has been marred both by logistical difficulties that prevented many Nepalis from registering, and by a basic lack of transparency that gives reason to doubt the integrity of the final electoral register. Crucially, the concerned authorities have failed to make any real effort to investigate or prosecute politicians responsible for mobilizing violence ahead of the elections. The use of violence for political ends became routine in many parts of the country during the past general and local elections and politicians in many constituencies particularly in the terai have mobilized and armed criminal gangs ahead of the elections in order to harass their opponents as well as to intimidate and disenfranchise the voting public. Electoral violence poses a tremendous threat to voters on polling day but in many instances security force appear to be standing by as powerful politicians mobilize criminal gangs to undermine the vote. In the face of authorities' inaction, the severity of election-related violence has gradually risen since the first General Elections in 1991, claiming scores of lives and injuring many more. If this trend is not rectified, the June polls are likely to flawed raising serious question on the credibility of the polling Proposed Code of Conduct All political parties and independent groups
Voters and Supporters
Election Monitors
The Parties in Power
Public Servants on Election duty
|
|||
| Last Updated on Thursday, 15 July 2010 17:04 |